Ethics and Virtue

The following is a series of notes taken from a class on Ethics I took from Dr. Ray Wheeler, back in January of 2009. The class took place at Daystar University, in Nairobi, Kenya.

Ethics is central to leadership because of the nature of the process of influence.

Influence: Engages followers

Accomplishes mutual goals

Ethics is central to leadership because of the impact leaders have on establishing the organization’s values.

 

Different forms of ethics:

Philosophical

Theological

Social

Professional

 

II. Intention for Ethical Dilemmas

Our intentions assume a right or wrong, against a universal law.

Our intention is based on self-examination.

 

Ethics is the process of making decisions based on moral assumptions.

 

How do I handle conflicting values? “On the one side, I value truthfulness; on the other side I value human life.”

 

III. What is Ethics?

Ethos; customs, conduct or character (what society finds desirable)

Values

Honesty

Consideration of others

Diligence

Reliability

Values: ideas, principles or beliefs that are held as special

Morals: authoritative statements or ideals of what is right or wrong

Virtue: operative habit that is essentially good

Kindness, discipline, honesty, hospitality, etc., are examples of virtue.

Motive: reasons from which an individual determines behavior.

Anger, love, temper, desire for glory, etc., are examples of motive.

 

IV. A short history of ethics

[Plato] Eudaemonistic ethics: human wellbeing is the highest aim of moral thought and conduct to which the virtues are requisite skills and character traits.

 

[Aristotle] Ethics as grounded on virtues, but he rejected Plato’s insistence that training in sciences and metaphysics was a prerequisite to understanding the good.

 

Aristotle

Ethical behavior exhibits virtues in the mean between:

Deficiency

And

Excess

Virtue is contrasted by vice in pursuit of the mean,

The behaviors may be:

Voluntary

Or

Involuntary

ethical grid

We must examine what we drift into easily… We must drag ourselves off in the contrary direction…”

 

The definition of the mean is determined by society.

 

The mother tree grows new trees through its roots, rather than scattered seeds

Its roots form new trees, which when are cut at the right time, form new groves

All trees are connected to one another

 

V. The Moral Agent

Aristotle: the moral agent can fulfill his or her moral obligation.

Example: Someone points a gun at you and says to rob the bank.

Duty: I do not steal.

Prima Facie: I will preserve my life.

I cannot obey both. If fail my duty due to duress, I will not be held morally responsible.

 

VI. Approaches to ethics

Teleological: decision based on the consequence

Essentially, teleological ethics is based on what happens.

The good (the end) drives the decision.

The result determines the rule.

The result is the basis of the action.

The result is sometimes used to break the rules.

The rule is good because of the result.

 

Deontological: decision based on duty

Essentially, deontological ethics are based on your beliefs.

The duty drives the decision.

The rule determines the result.

The rule is the basis of the act.

The rule is good regardless of the result.

The result is calculated within the rules.

 

PRINCIPLE: The more facts you discover as a leader the better the decision.

 

VII. Northouse’s Foci of Ethical Reasoning

Conduct-based ethics

Consequences (teleological theories)

Ethical egoism: decision made to my greatest benefit

Utilitarianism: what is the greatest possible good for the greatest number of people; using pragmatism as a style of invention

Act utilitarianism: is what is best in a specific case

Rule utilitarianism: is what is generally best in most contexts

Altruism: decisions should be made in light of the best interests of others

Leaders intent on benefiting others will pursue organizational goals.

Conversely self-focused leaders focus on personal achievement and control.

Duty (deontological theories)

 

Character-based ethics

Virtue-based theories

 

Can Kant’s Categorical Imperative remain?

 

Velasquez (1992)

Perseverance

Public-spiritedness

Integrity

Truthfulness

Fidelity

Benevolence

Humility

 

Northouse (2004)

Builds community

Respects others

Serves others

Shows justice

Manifests honesty

Goal: to exercise awareness of the impact of leadership decisions

 

VIII. Models of Virtue

Aristotle

Courage

Temperance

Generosity

Self control

Honesty

Sociability

Modesty

Fairness

Justice

Goal: Live well in community. 

What virtues anchor our ethics?

 

IX. Ethics in organizational leadership

Point: ethics has to do with a) what leaders do and b) who leaders are.

Importance: in any decision-making situation implicit or explicit ethical issues exist.

 

X. Reflection

A leader is a person who has an unusual degree of power to create the conditions under which other people must live and move and have their being, conditions that can be either as illuminating as heaven or as shadowy as hell. A leader must take special responsibility for what’s going on inside his or her own self, inside his or her conscience, lest the act of leadership create more harm than good.” (Parker Palmer, “Leading from Within”)

 

What you are has a serious impact on what you do. A leader cannot separate himself from his responsibility. A leader has to accept the responsibilities of leadership. You have this impact whether or not you accept this responsibility. There is a direct teleological response that comes with every decision a leader makes.

Group Dynamics

The following is a series of notes taken from a class on Conflict Dynamics I took from Dr. Macmillan Kiiru, back in January of 2009. The class took place at Daystar University, in Nairobi, Kenya.

Group dynamics:
Focuses on advancing knowledge about the nature of Group Life

The Scientific study of the:

a) Nature of Groups, b) Behavior in Groups, and c) Group Development

The Knowledge of Group Dynamics helps the way we think and/or function in groups

 

“My life is our life.”

 

III. Assertive People:

  • Meet conflict directly
  • Does not pretend everything is ok
  • Looks for win/win situations
  • Brings the facts forward
  • Does not let offenses build
  • Willing to compromise to arrive at a destination
  • Open-minded to other solutions
  • Assist others in problem-solving
  • Address problems immediately
  • Let others how they truly feel
  • Upbeat, positive tone
  • Empathic reasoning
  • Seeking out constructive feedback
  • Refraining from ‘beating around the bush’
  • Making certain they are properly understood
  • Establishing healthy boundaries
  • Lack of attacking individual character
  • Always ask tough questions
  • Sensitivity towards feelings of others
  • Hold other people accountable

Honest, initiative, forgiving, trusting, humble, non-defensive, serving, reliable

 

Vs. being Aggressive:

  • Proud and self-centered
  • Want what it wants, without others concern
  • Always right
  • Must win at all costs
  • Attack others when disagree
  • Offensively opinionated
  • Exaggerated
  • Close-minded
  • Slams doors
  • Always seem angry
  • Constantly interrupts
  • Dominates conversations
  • Intentionally intimidates

 

IV. The Process

Many achievers are of necessity, aggressive. Aggressive people, however, tend to be very lonely. The environment around us demands certain behaviors that often are not necessarily positive. The backgrounds, the way we are raised at home, sometimes produce an aggressive or passive person. But we should look back, to see where we are. This is a discipline we work through.

How sustainable is aggressive behavior? It doesn’t last long. Aggression leads to “a cliff.” It can be self-destructive. That is why it is not self-sustainable. But assertive behavior is sustainable, because of the responsiveness of those around.

 

V. Understanding Groups:

1) A group may be defined as a number of individuals who join together to achieve a goal

2) People join groups in order to achieve goals they are unable to achieve by themselves

3) A collection of individuals who are interdependent in some way

4) A number of individuals who are interacting with one another

 

Groups have goals. They are interdependent, as they interact with each other. Often, though, the goal of the group is not the goal of the individual. How do you harmonize the group and individual goal?